Interacciones farmacológicas de los captores del fósforo / Pharmacological interactions of phosphate binders

No disponible

Gestión clínica en nefrología: resultados y costes / Clinical management in nephrology: outcomes and costs

No disponible

Pharmacodynamics of cinacalcet over 48 hours in patients with controlled secondary hyperparathyroidism: useful data in clinical practice.

CONTEXT: Cinacalcet induces immediate changes in serum PTH levels, but the pharmacodynamic effect throughout the daily dosing interval in controlled patients is unknown. Also, in patients with reduced PTH, it is unknown what happens in the first 24 hours after withdrawal. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to describe the effect over 48 hours of cinacalcet in hemodialysis patients with controlled secondary hyperparathyroidism. DESIGN: This was a phase 4, open-label, single-arm, single-dose, single-center clinical trial. SETTING: The study was conducted at a public hospital (Hospital Perpetuo Socorro, Alicante, Spain). PATIENTS: We included 10 patients on cinacalcet for 6 months or longer with intact PTH (iPTH) levels 100-400 pg/mL [8 men, mean age of 66 years (range 39-82 years)], chronically treated with 30 mg (n = 6), 60 mg (n = 3), or 90 mg (n = 1) of cinacalcet. INTERVENTION: A single dose (30-90 mg) was administered at baseline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: iPTH (Duo Kit Scantibodies and Elecsys Roche), PTH 1-84, ionized calcium, phosphorus (P), and calcitonin were determined at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in iPTH between 1 and 6 hours, and values returned to baseline at 24 hours [maximum mean (95% confidence interval) percent change from baseline: -50%(-34; -66) at 3 hours]. A transient increase in calcitonin and a decrease in P were also observed, with no changes in calcium. At 48 hours, there was a significant increase in iPTH [+51% (26; 76)] and P. Changes in PTH were similar with the 3 determination methods. CONCLUSIONS: In hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism controlled by cinacalcet, a transient (1-6 hours) reduction in PTH and P and an increase in calcitonin are observed after each daily dose, with return to baseline at 24 hours. After calcimimetics discontinuation, PTH was significantly increased at 48 hours. The assay used to measure PTH does not influence relative changes induced by cinacalcet.

Evaluación del bienestar espiritual en pacientes en hemodiálisis / Evaluation of spiritual well-being in haemodialysis patients

Introducción: Se define la espiritualidad como la búsqueda personal de propósito y significado en la vida, pudiendo incorporar o no la religión. En este artículo se presenta el desarrollo y la aplicación de una medida de bienestar espiritual a una muestra de pacientes en hemodiálisis. Material y métodos: El instrumento básico empleado se denomina Cuestionario del Sentido de la Vida (Meaning in Life Scale , MiLS), con 21 ítems y cuatro escalas: Propósito, Falta de significado, Paz y Beneficios de la espiritualidad. También se proporciona una puntuación global de espiritualidad. Además, se registraron variables de tipo clínico (tiempo en hemodiálisis, índice de comorbilidad de Charlson) y sociodemográfico (edad, género), así como estimaciones del estado de salud, calidad de vida (general y actual), felicidad personal, el grado de religiosidad y la creencia en la existencia de vida ultraterrena. Se ha utilizado un diseño transversal con 94 pacientes en hemodiálisis. Resultados: Los resultados muestran que la versión española de este instrumento (MiLS-Sp) es una medida de (..) (AU)

Introduction: Spirituality can be defined as a personal search for meaning and purpose in life that may or may not encompass religion. In this article we report on the development and testing of an instrument for measuring spiritual well-being within a sample of haemodialysis patients. Material and Method: The main instrument, a 21-item Meaning in Life Scale (MiLS), comprises four scales: Life Perspective, Purpose and Goals, Confusion and Lessened Meaning, Harmony and Peace, and Benefits of Spirituality. A total score for spiritual well-being is also produced. We also used the following variables: clinical (time on haemodialysis, modified Charlson comorbidity index), sociodemographic (age, gender), and self-assessments of health, quality of life (general and recent), personal happiness, religiosity, and belief in the (..) (AU)

Evaluation of spiritual well-being in haemodialysis patients.

INTRODUCTION: Spirituality can be defined as a personal search for meaning and purpose in life that may or may not encompass religion. In this article we report on the development and testing of an instrument for measuring spiritual well-being within a sample of haemodialysis patients. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The main instrument, a 21-item Meaning in Life Scale (MiLS), comprises four scales: Life Perspective, Purpose and Goals, Confusion and Lessened Meaning, Harmony and Peace, and Benefits of Spirituality. A total score for spiritual well-being is also produced. We also used the following variables: clinical (time on haemodialysis, modified Charlson comorbidity index), sociodemographic (age, gender), and self-assessments of health, quality of life (general and recent), personal happiness, religiosity, and belief in the afterlife. A cross-sectional study was carried out on 94 haemodialysis patients. RESULTS: This study demonstrates that the MiLS-Sp is a psychometrically sound measure of spiritual well-being for dialysis patients (reliability, validity) as they manage the complex demands of a chronic illness. Spiritual well-being was significantly associated with various quality of life variables, health status, personal happiness, or religiosity in patients on dialysis. There was no relationship between spirituality scores and comorbidity, HD duration, gender, or age. Spiritual well-being is relatively low in dialysis patients. CONCLUSION: Spirituality may play an important role on psychological well-being, quality of life, and self-rated health for patients on haemodialysis. Spiritual well-being in these patients is relatively low. Results suggest that assessing and addressing spiritual well-being in dialysis patients may be helpful in clinical practice.

Outcomes weighting for comprehensive haemodialysis centre assessment.

BACKGROUND: At present, there is no adequate system available for evaluating dialysis centres. OBJECTIVES: To construct an overall haemodialysis results weighting system, acceptable to the different stakeholders involved which allows the comparison of centres using a compound marker. METHOD: The Quality Management Work Group of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (WG) established a set of preselected indicators. A Focus Group, independent of the WG, was established. It was made up of nine individuals: three patients, three clinicians and three clinical managers, who assessed these indicators using an approved methodology and established the selected indicators. Finally, the indicators were weighted through three weighting stages, each separated by two debate periods, which involved the distribution of 100 points between each variable, according to the personal assessment and the debate sustained. RESULTS: The clinical results included: haemodialysis doses, anaemia, plasma calcium and phosphorus, type of vascular access, and hospitalisation days. The weighting given to each variable following the third weighting process, expressed as an average of all the factors, was as follows: clinical results 38.9; annual mortality 25.0; satisfaction with the centre 12.2; health-related quality of life 15.6; and cost 8.3 (total 100). CONCLUSIONS: The weighting structure covers relevant and overall results and includes the opinion of all stakeholders involved; all of which will increase its acceptability and widespread use and contribute to the analysis of the value produced by the centres and the improvement of the results.

Application of NKF-K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Bone Metabolism and Disease: changes of clinical practices and their effects on outcomes and quality standards in three haemodialysis units.

BACKGROUND: The K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Bone Metabolism and Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease was published in October 2003. The objective of this study was to analyse the effect of the application of those guidelines on clinical practices and on the achievement of bone disease targets and quality standards. METHODS: We included in the study 342 patients dialysed in our three HD units during 2003 and 2004. Starting October 2003, the K-DOQI recommendations were introduced into practice. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) was measured every 3 months and the serum Ca and P levels, monthly. In patients whose medications were modified, PTH was measured monthly and Ca and P levels, weekly or biweekly. RESULTS: The following are the main findings for 2004 (post-K/DOQI): an increased use of dialysates with a Ca concentration of 2.5 mEq/l (27.2-50.9%, P<0.001) and a reduced use of a dialysate calcium of 3.0 mEq/l (44.6-39.6%, P: NS) and 3.5 mEq/l (28-9.4%, P<0.001); a reduced use of calcium-based phosphate binders (891.9-565.5 mg Ca/day, P<0.001) and increased use of sevelamer hydrochloride (800 mg) (from 4.86 to 7.51 mg, tablets/day, P<0.001) lower serum Ca levels (9.7-9.4 mg/dl, P<0.01), and higher intact PTH levels (201.4-311.8 pg/ml, P<0.001), without changes in serum P levels; an increased proportion of patients with serum Ca levels within the K/DOQI target range (38.7-46.6%, P<0.01), resulting mainly from the reduced percentage of patients with hypercalcaemia (55-44.4%, P<0.01); a decreased proportion of patients with PTH<150 pg/ml (53.8-31.4%, P<0.001) but an increased proportion of patients with PTH>300 pg/ml, with no change in the proportion of patients with PTHs within the K/DOQI target range. Phosphorus levels and targets did not show significant differences between 2003 and 2004 (56.9-56.2%, P: NS). CONCLUSIONS: The only way to ensure that K/DOQI guidelines actually improve medical outcomes is to emphasize implementation strategies and also the scientific evaluation of their effectiveness in clinical settings. In spite of the application of the K-DOQI recommendations, a large proportion of our patients stayed outside the proposed targets, which points to the need for more effective therapeutic options.

A multicentric survey of the practice of hand hygiene in haemodialysis units: factors affecting compliance.

BACKGROUND: This study intended to investigate the degree of compliance with hand hygiene and use of gloves by health workers in haemodialysis (HD) units, and the factors that influenced adherence to hand hygiene protocols. METHODS: During the month of November 2003, one person observed the health care staff in each of nine different dialysis units, during 495 randomly distributed 30 min observation periods that covered all steps of a haemodialysis session (connection, dialysis and disconnection). The observers noted the number of potential opportunities to implement standard precautions and the number of occasions on which the precautions were actually taken. Adherence to standard precautions was evaluated, analysing the influence of the following variables: the patient-to-nurse ratio, the number of HD shifts scheduled per day, acute HD units vs chronic, whether or not infectious patients were isolated and in-house vs contract cleaning personnel. RESULTS: There were a total of 977 opportunities to wear gloves for, and to wash the hands following, a patient-oriented activity, and 1902 opportunities to wash hands before such an activity. Gloves were actually used on 92.9% of these occasions. Hands were washed only 35.6% of the time after patient contact, and only 13.8% of the time before patient contact. Poor adherence to hand washing was associated with the number of shifts per HD unit per day and with higher patient-to-nurse ratios. In the acute HD units, there was greater adherence to standard precautions than in the chronic units, although there too it was substandard. The personnel's knowledge of patients' infectious status did not modify their adherence to hand hygiene practices. A higher patient-to-nurse ratio independently influenced hand washing both before and after patient contact. CONCLUSIONS: The overall adherence of health care workers to recommended hand washing practices is low. Whether or not programmes promoting higher hand hygiene standards and the potential use of alcohol-based hand cleansers will improve hand hygiene practices in HD units requires further investigation.